<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mediation &amp; Negotiation - John Clark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediation-negotiation.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediation-negotiation.com</link>
	<description>Improving dialogue and reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The S Word by Mediation opening statement &#8211; what not to say in a</title>
		<link>http://www.mediation-negotiation.com/2011/05/the-s-word/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Mediation opening statement &#8211; what not to say in a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediation-negotiation.com/?p=35#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] have an important part to play in the settlement of this type of case. But the key, as mediator Dr John Clark points out, is sincerity. A perfunctorily delivered &#8220;sorry&#8221; will be recognised as such [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have an important part to play in the settlement of this type of case. But the key, as mediator Dr John Clark points out, is sincerity. A perfunctorily delivered &#8220;sorry&#8221; will be recognised as such [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technology in negotiations by JOHN DUNCAN</title>
		<link>http://www.mediation-negotiation.com/2011/05/technology-in-negotiations/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN DUNCAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 07:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediation-negotiation.com/?p=272#comment-14</guid>
		<description>John
The type of behaviour you describe is now very widespread in multilateral diplomacy and in meetings where there there are a number of representatives. In smaller face to face meetings then you are right it would defeat the object of the &quot;personal meeting&quot; if people were constantly texting. But elsewhere its common indeed a phot I took of my delegation at a recent New York meeting showed them all sitting behind me with there laptops open. Some were taking notes but others were reporting back, gathering information etc. How times change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John<br />
The type of behaviour you describe is now very widespread in multilateral diplomacy and in meetings where there there are a number of representatives. In smaller face to face meetings then you are right it would defeat the object of the &#8220;personal meeting&#8221; if people were constantly texting. But elsewhere its common indeed a phot I took of my delegation at a recent New York meeting showed them all sitting behind me with there laptops open. Some were taking notes but others were reporting back, gathering information etc. How times change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

